Huntington Ingalls to pay $9.2 million to settle overbilling claims

Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., Newport, Va., has agreed to pay $9.2 million to settle allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by knowingly overbilling the government for labor on Navy and Coast Guard vessels at its shipyards in Pascagoula, Miss.

Under the settlement announced Tuesday by the Department of Justice, Huntington Ingalls will make a payment of $7.9 million which, combined with earlier repayments, will result in a settlement of approximately $9.2 million.

“Contractors that knowingly bill the government in violation of contract terms will face serious consequences,” Acting Assistant Attorney General Chad A. Readler of the Justice Department’s Civil Division said in a statement. “This settlement demonstrates, once again, that we will not tolerate defense contractors who falsely charge the armed forces or any agency of the United States.”

“Our armed forces depend on defense contractors to follow the rules, and this civil settlement, the second largest in the district’s history, should remind all those who conduct business with the United States government that they are expected to abide by the rules,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Harold Brittain, who also noted three earlier guilty pleas in a related criminal matter in the Southern District of Mississippi.

Two individuals pleaded guilty in United States v. N. R. Holden & R.G. Gardner, Criminal No 1:15-cr-42 HSO-RHW, and were sentenced in 2015. Another individual pleaded guilty in United States v. R.M. Wilson, Criminal No 1:16-cr-34-LG-RHW, and was sentenced in 2016. According to Brittain, “the Southern District of Mississippi will remain vigilant in identifying and prosecuting those involved in nefarious activities and fraudulent billing, which ultimately result in substantial cost overruns on Navy and Coast Guard shipbuilding projects.”

Special Agent in Charge of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) Southeast Field Office, Mike Wiest, said, “Corruption, fraud and bribery are not victimless crimes. Overcharging for work not done is not only criminal on its face, investigating those crimes siphoned resources and time which would have been better invested in protecting the nation. Multiple federal agencies spent years investigating this lack of integrity, to help hold accountable those who would squander American taxpayer dollars.”

“Today’s results are part of ongoing efforts by the Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) and its law enforcement partners to protect the integrity of the Coast Guard’s acquisition systems by holding individuals and corporations accountable when they attempt to defraud U.S. taxpayers”, said Special Agent in Charge Brian Jeanfreau.

“Contractors are expected to comply with their statutory obligations and act in good faith when dealing with the Department of Defense (DOD),” commented John F. Khin, Special Agent in Charge, Southeast Field Office, Defense Criminal Investigative Service. “This settlement … clearly demonstrates that combatting fraud, waste and abuse within DOD contracting remains a top priority.”

The civil settlement resolves alleged labor mischarging on various Navy and Coast Guard contracts dating back to 2003. Huntington Ingalls allegedly mischarged labor that was incurred on particular contracts to other contracts, even though the costs were not actually incurred by those contracts. The settlement also resolves claims disclosed by Ingalls that it had billed the Navy and Coast Guard for dive operations to support ship hull construction that did not actually occur as claimed.

The labor mischarging allegations resolved by the settlement were originally raised in a lawsuit brought by Bryon Faulkner, a former shipyard employee, under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA), which permit private individuals to sue on behalf of the government for false claims and to share in any recovery. Act also allows the government to intervene and take over the action, as it did in this case. Faulkner will receive $1.6 million as a result of the civil action he filed, which is captioned United States ex rel. Faulkner v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. 1:13-cv-295 HSO RHW in the Southern District of Mississippi.

The claims made in the complaint are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

About the author

Workboat Staff

Leave A Reply

© Diversified Communications. All rights reserved.