Ocean science needs to catch up with offshore wind energy

Construction could begin on East Coast offshore wind energy projects in the next couple of years, but the state of science to monitor their environmental effects is lagging badly, experts said at the annual American Fisheries Society meeting held in Atlantic City, N.J., this week.

“We’re talking about building projects in a few years … yet we lack a built, on-the-ground monitoring program,” said Andrew Lipsky, a planning officer who leads research into offshore wind energy with the National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center.

From Massachusetts to Maryland, state governments are aggressively promoting offshore wind power development, setting renewable energy goals, and striking deals for power purchase agreements.

The Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states are “where all the electrical demands are,” said Brian Hooker, a marine biologist with the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy’s renewable energy program. Those states are driving the demand and developers have a dozen approved federal leases, with BOEM now reviewing two construction and operation plans, Hooker said Tuesday at the AFS meeting.

A daylong session featured presentations by researchers looking at how building arrays of wind turbines on the shallow continental shelf could affect fish populations, and the commercial fishing industry.

Fishermen share some of the same concerns as the maritime transportation sector, including safety of navigation, ensuring turbines are spaced widely enough to allow maneuvering, and the issue of misleading radar echoes that can be generating by turbine rotors.

A map showing overlap between scallop fishing areas and potential future wind energy lease areas, BOEM graphic.

A map showing overlap between scallop fishing areas and potential future wind energy lease areas in the New York Bight. BOEM graphic.

For all its promotion as a “green” technology, offshore wind power faces its share of environmental hurdles. Wind developers will need to deal with potential conflicts over marine mammals, including the highly endangered northern right whales that migrate near massive wind arrays proposed off Massachusetts.

For mobile gear fishermen, there is fear that large parts of the leases could be effectively off-limits to them because towers are too close together to safely trawl or dredge. Advocates for the scallop and surf clam fleets argue that turbine arrays will effectively create “sanctuaries” for shellfish that are available in abundance thanks to responsible management.

This spring industry advocates organized the Responsible Offshore Development Alliance, to bring together diverse East Coast fishing fleets and operators to more effectively engage the wind industry and federal and state regulators.

Their goal is to “get better outcomes,” said Anne Hawkins of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, a Washington, D.C., law firm that represents scallop fishermen who have sued in federal court over New York offshore wind proposals.

Maps prepared by BOEM using federal fisheries data shows existing wind leases and potential future lease areas overlapping with the scallop fishery, based out of ports like New Bedford, Mass., and Cape May, N.J.

“You can see how the proposed wind areas cover large parts of the scallop fishery,” Hawkins said at a panel discussion that capped the session. “We need to get back to basics and gather as much of this information as quickly as possible.”

Despite BOEM hosting listening sessions and other public events to get input about potential leasing areas, Hawkins said the fishing industry does not see transparency or consistency in how that information is being used. Fisheries considerations are not at all clear in the regulations governing wind development, she said.

“The problem we’re having with this (wind energy) development is we have this very dynamic fishery” off the East Coast, said Kevin Stokesbury, a professor at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth School for Marine Science and Technology who has long worked with New England fishermen.

Fishermen expect the wind industry should be held to the same standard of science used for fisheries regulation, said Stokesbury.

“The problem that I see is we really haven’t made that decision,” he added. “In a few years, we’re going to have a lot of construction, and that doesn’t give us a lot of time to get the baseline down.”

Speakers agreed that it is unrealistic to expect new, dedicated government funding, and that existing efforts must be brought to bear on wind power planning. The engagement between developers and the Responsible Offshore Development Alliance is a start, and the Mid-Atlantic and New England Fishery Management councils should play a big role, they said.

“The infrastructure is there … we need to leverage these resources,” said Lipsky of NMFS. “This can’t be a bake sale approach. We have to think really big.”

 

About the author

Kirk Moore

Associate Editor Kirk Moore was a reporter for the Asbury Park Press for over 30 years before joining WorkBoat in 2015. He wrote several award-winning stories on marine, environmental, coastal and military issues that helped drive federal and state government policy changes. He has also been a field editor for WorkBoat’s sister publication, National Fisherman, for almost 25 years. Moore was awarded the Online News Association 2011 Knight Award for Public Service for the “Barnegat Bay Under Stress,” 2010 series that led to the New Jersey state government’s restoration plan. He lives in West Creek, N.J.

4 Comments

  1. Pingback: Ocean science needs to catch up with offshore wind energy | Hagen Ruff of Chava Wind

  2. Wind is not a good long term solution. It is a mature tech, so there is not a lot of room for further cost reductions. It kills birds. And wind in the ocean poses navigational hazards.

    Solar is continuing its 65 year trend of exponentially declining prices, and within 10 years solar plus batteries will be cheaper than fossil fuels. Once that price point is reached the switch will begin in earnest.

  3. Offshore wind will inhibit the fishing to near depletion of Atlantic Cod? Harm whales worse than whale hunting to near extinction. Be more harmful than fossil fuel burning climate change coupled with fertilizer run off causing toxic algea blooms and red tides that kill most water life? Be more harmful than fossil fuel driven ocean acidification?

  4. I have to wonder how many osprey are going to be killed by these windmills. They are already famous for killing eagles in California, so why will ospreys be spared? The bases are not an issue. The oil rigs in the gulf have shown themselves to be wonderful fish habitats, but the rotating blades are an issue. Aside from that, what happens when the wind dies, as often happens in the summer? All the power needed, still has to come from fossil fueled power plants, which have to be built and maintained, even when wind generators are powering the grid. To say I am not impressed by “renewable energy”, would be an understatement, but, as the powers that be are insisting on it, we need to regulate it to be compatible with the fisheries industries. The fishermen need to be the authors of how the offshore fields are built. Anything else is asking for disaster.

Leave A Reply

© Diversified Communications. All rights reserved.